 |


|
|
As the demand for trails increases, planners and user groups are increasingly
looking at the possibility of putting trails into corridors alongside
active rail lines. Many railroad corridors are more than 100 feet
wide and have just one or two active lines still in operation; other
corridors are bounded by open space and appear to be good candidates
for trail development. Many rail lines have low levels of service,
perhaps just one or two trains per day. |
An active rail line and a trail, separated
by trees, shrubbery and grass. |
Placing trails alongside active rail lines, however, is not going
to be an option in most situations as there isn't enough space to
safely separate frequent high speed trains from trail users; and there
are real fears about trespassing and other safety and operational
issues that must be addressed.
Despite these fears, there are already more than 50 such rails with
trails projects in operation and the Federal Railroad Administration
(www.dot.gov/affairs/fra2699.htm)
is studying the operation and safety of these facilities so that they
can provide more guidance on how, and if, this kind of shared use
can be managed safely.
Issues and Concerns
Trespassing
- Although the numbers have been falling in recent years, more than
500 people every year are killed by trains while they are trespassing
in railroad corridors. Railroad companies and the Federal Railroad Administration are actively
discouraging and preventing trespassing on railroad property and fear
that the development of trails alongside active rail lines will either
encourage trespassing or diminish the impact of their efforts to keep
people away from moving trains.
Safety - In addition to the danger of being hit by a moving train,
safety advocates are also concerned about the potential impact of
placing trail users close enough to trains that they might be hit
by debris kicked up by a high-speed train, or knocked over by the
wind blast of a passing vehicle.
Crossing Active Tracks - The development of rails-with-trails will
also increase the number of trail crossings of active rail lines as
trail users get to and from their destinations. The railroad industry
is alread concerned about the number of uncontrolled at-grade railroad
crossings and is unlikely to encourage more of them as part of a trail
project. The installation of gates and barriers is unlikely to be
cost effective on all but the very busiest of trails.
Railroad Concerns - Railroad companies have other real concerns about
the impact of trails on the operation of their business. For example,
traffic patterns on the railroad network can change quite suddenly,
meaning that once quiet lines can almost overnight become major corridors
carrying frequent heavy freight trains - and thus making them much
less suitable for shared use with a trail.
Trains may kick up debris as they go, and items may fall off a loaded
train. The railroads do not want the perceived additional liability
concerns associated with having trail users close enough to an active
train line that they might be hit by debris.
Railroads are also keen to avoid any misunderstanding among trail
users that their maintenance roads alongside active rail lines are
open for bicycling and walking. In many cases, maintenance corridors
may have a similar soft surface to rural trails.
Train crews have to deal with the horror of their train hitting and
killing people on the tracks, unable to do anything to stop the fatal
collision. Some crew members never recover from the trauma. Railroad
companies want to prevent this from happening at all costs and may
see a rail-with-trail proposal as increasing the possibility of a
fatal crash with a trail user.
Solutions
The
existence of more than 50 rails-with-trails projects indicates that
these concerns can be overcome with careful planning, design, and
management. Among the strategies curently being pursued are:
Locating the trail as far away from the active rail line as possible, either within the existing railroad right-of-way or on land bordering the rail line.
Separating the trail from the rail line with fencing or other effective barriers.
Maintaining or creating a height differential so that the trail is higher than the rail line.
Designing the trail to minimize contact with the rail line (e.g. screening the rail line with trees and shrubs).
Posting clear warnings and education materials to prevent trespassing.
Clearly marking the trail to heighten the distinctions between trails and railroad maintenance corridors.
Grade separating trail and rail line intersections.
|
|
 |