Table of Contents | Sections | List of Figures | List of Tables
  Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities:
Recommended Procedures for the "Bicycles" Chapter of the Highway Capacity Manual


5 EXAMPLE PROBLEMS

Example 1 - Uninterrupted, Exclusive Bicycle Path


For this example, the following is assumed:

  • the bicycle path operates with two effective lanes;
  • the path runs approximately north-south;
  • peak-hour volume of 90 bicycles/h;
  • peak-hour factor of 0.60; and
  • a 70:30 directional split northbound:southbound.
The first step is to convert the peak-hour volume to a peak flow rate as follows:
1) Adjusted Peak-Hour Flow Rate = Peak-hour volume/peak-hour factor = 90/0.60 = 150 bikes/h
2) The total frequency of events and LOS for each direction is then computed using Equation [3] (which incorporates Equations [1] and [2]) and the computed peak flow rate of 150 bikes/h:

Ftotal = 0.5 [Fmeet] + [Fpass]

= 0.5 [2{Vbike-op}] + [0.188{Vbike-sm}]
= 0.5 [2{(opp. dir. split)(peak flow rate)}] + [0.188{(same dir. split)(peak flow rate)}]

NORTHBOUND: Ftotal = 0.5 [ 2{(0.30)(150)}] + [0.188{(0.70)(150)}] = 65 events/h

Using Table 1, this represents LOS C for the northbound direction.

SOUTHBOUND: Ftotal = 0.5 [ 2{(0.70)(150)}] + [0.188{(0.30)(150)}] = 113 events/h

Using Table 1, this represents LOS D for the southbound direction.

Example 2 - Uninterrupted, Mixed-Use Path

For this example, the following is assumed:

  • the bicycle path operates with three effective lanes;
  • the path runs approximately east-west;
  • adjusted peak-hour flow rate of 150 bicycles/h;
  • adjusted peak-hour flow rate of 80 pedestrians/h;
  • a 60:40 directional split of bicycles eastbound:westbound; and
  • a 50:50 directional split of pedestrians eastbound:westbound.

The total frequency of events and LOS for each direction is then computed using Equation [6]
(which incorporates Equations [4] and [5]):

Ftotal = 0.5 [Fmeet] + [Fpass]

= 0.5 [5{Vped-op} + 2{Vbike-op}] + [3{Vped-sm} + 0.188{Vbike-sm}]
= 0.5 [5{(opp. dir. ped split)(ped peak flow rate)} + 2{(opp. dir. bike split)(bike peak flow rate)}] + [3{(same dir. ped split)(ped peak flow rate)}
+ 0.188{(same dir bike split)(bike peak flow rate)}]
EB: Ftotal = 0.5 [5{(0.5)(80)} + 2{(0.4)(150)}] + [3{(0.5)(80)} + 0.188{(0.6)(150)}]
= 297 events/h
Interpolation between 100 and 200 bikes/h on Table 3 produces the same results. Using Table 4, this represents LOS D for the eastbound direction.

WB: Ftotal = 0.5 [5{(0.5)(80)} + 2{(0.6)(150)}] + [3{(0.5)(80)} + 0.188{(0.4)(150)}]

= 321 events/h
Interpolation between 100 and 200 bikes/h on Table 3 produces the same results. Using Table 4, this represents LOS E for the westbound direction.

Example 3 - On-Street Bicycle Lane


For this example, the following is assumed:

  • a bicycle lane with allowance for passing;
  • hourly bicycle volume of 150 bicycles/h, and a PHF of 0.75;
  • heavy side friction characterized by large vehicle volume and high driveway density; and
  • observed mean speed of 18 km/h and standard deviation of 4.5 km/h.

Since the standard deviation of speeds of 4.5 km/h is different from the default value of 3 km/h, equations [1] to [3] cannot be used. Table 5 must be used to predict the number of passing events and LOS.

First, the bicycle volume is converted to a peak flow rate as follows:

Bicycle flow rate = Hourly Volume/ PHF = 150/0.75= 200 bikes/h

Referring to Table 5, for 200 bikes/h, a mean speed of 18 km/h and standard deviation of 4.5 km/h, the predicted number of passing events is 113/h. This represents a LOS D on the facility.

For comparison purposes, if the default values were used (18 km/h, 3 km/h standard deviation), the predicted number of events would drop to 75 events/h. This would incorrectly represent LOS C on the facility.

Example 4 - Interrupted, Signalized Intersection

For this example, the following is assumed:

  • effective green time for movement in question = 20 s, cycle length = 50 s; and
  • adjusted peak-hour flow rate is 120 bicycles/h for approach in question.
First, the capacity is computed using Equation [7], with an assumed bicycle saturation flow rate (sbike) of 2000 bikes/h of green:

cbike = sbike (g/C) = 2000(20/50) = 800 bikes/h


The average signal delay is then computed using Equation [8]:


d = 0.5C [1 - (g/C)]2 / {1 - (g/C)[Min (Vbike/cbike , 1.0)]}


= 0.5(50) [ 1 - (20/50) ]2 / { 1 - (20/50)[Min (120/800, 1.0)] } = 9.6 s


Using Table 6, this represents LOS B.



Example 5 - Combined Bicycle Facility

For this example, the following is assumed:

  • the 2-km (1.2-mi) arterial contains four links and three signalized intersection nodes;
  • the peak direction for this link during the peak hour is westbound;
  • the four links are 0.5, 0.2, 1.0, and 0.3 km (0.31, 0.12, 0.62, and 0.19 mi) in length, respectively;
  • the signalized intersections all have cycle lengths (C) of 100 s with g/C ratios of 0.3, 0.5 and 0.4 on the westbound approaches; and
  • the adjusted peak-hour flow rate in the westbound direction is 600 bicycles/h.

The average delays for each of the intersections are computed using Equation [8] (which incorporates Equation [7]) and an assumed bicycle saturation flow rate (sbike) of 2000 bikes/h of green:

di = 0.5C [1 - (g/C)]2 / {1 - (g/C)[Min (Vbike/{cbike}, 1.0)]}


= 0.5C [1 - (g/C)]2 / {1 - (g/C)[Min (Vbike/{(sbike)(g/C)}, 1.0)]}
d1 = 0.5 (100) [1 - (0.3) ]2 / { 1 - (0.3) [Min (600/{(2000)(0.3)}, 1.0 ] } = 35.0 s

d2 = 0.5 (100) [1 - (0.5) ]2 / { 1 - (0.5) [Min (600/{(2000)(0.5)}, 1.0 ] } = 17.9 s


d3 = 0.5 (100) [1 - (0.4) ]2 / { 1 - (0.4) [Min (600/{(2000)(0.4)}, 1.0 ] } = 25.7 s


Using an average uninterrupted travel speed (asi) of 25 km/h (15.5 mi/h) for all links, the average travel speed for the arterial is computed using Equation 9:



= 2 / [ { (0.5 + 0.2 + 1.0 + 0.3) / (25)} + { (35.0 + 17.9 + 25.7 ) / 3600 }] = 19.6 km/h


Using Table 7, this represents LOS B.

Table of Contents | Sections | List of Figures | List of Tables | Next>