|
4.2 - Details of
Recommended Procedure for Determining fLpb and
fRpb
The following paragraphs
contain the detailed procedure for computing the pedestrian-bicycle adjustment
factor for right turns, fRpb , or left turns,
fLpb. As an additional aid, Figures 9 and 10
provide supplemental worksheets containing this information in tabular
form.
1) Calculate pedestrian conflict zone occupancy, OCCpedg.
First, get the pedestrian flow rate, Vpedg from the
conflicting pedestrian hourly volume, Vped:
- Vpedg = Vped
* (C/gp) (Vpedg
< 5000)
Then, compute the average pedestrian
occupancy during the effective pedestiran green time.
Refer to Table 4 for the average occupancy, OCCpedg, or
use one of the following equations:
- For pedestrian flow rates
up to 1000 pedestrians/h green:
- OCCpedg
= Vpedg / 2000 (Vpedg
< 1000; OCCpedg < 0.5)
- For pedestrian flow rates
between 1000 and 5000 pedestrians/h green:
- OCCpedg
= 0.4 + Vpedg / 10,000 (1000 < Vpedg
< 5000; 0.5 < OCCpedg < 0.9)
2) Determine the relevant
conflict zone occupancy from the driver’s perspective, OCCr.
- For a right turn with no
bicycle interference or a left turn from a one-way street:
- The relevant occupancy
is exactly the pedestrian occupancy computed above, and:
OCCr = OCCpedg
- For a right turn with bicycle
interference:
- First convert bicycle hourly
volume, Vbike, to bicycles/h green, Vbikeg:
Vbikeg = Vbike * (C/g)
(Vbikeg < 1900)
- Next, determine the relevant,
combined occupancy of the adjacent pedestrian and bicycle conflict
zones. Table 5 provides this relevant occupancy, OCC r,
directlry from Vbikeg . Alternatively, determine the
occupancyof the bicycle conflict zone by itself, OCCbikeg:
OCCbikeg = 0.02 + Vbikeg / 2700
(Vbikeg < 1900; OCCbikeg
< 0.72)
and then compute the relevant, combined occupancy, OCCr,
by:
OCCr = OCCpedg + OCCbikeg
– (OCCpedg * OCCbikeg)
- For a left turn from a two-way
street:
- First check if opposing
traffic screens the conflict zone for the entire effective green
time:
If gq > gp Then
fLpb = 1.0 ; end procedure.
If the opposing queue does not consume the entire pedestrian green,
determine the pedestrian occupancy after the opposing queue clears,
OCCpedu. Use Table 6, or:
OCCpedu = OCCpedg * (1 - 0.5
(gq /gp) )
The relevant conflict zone occupancy after the queue clears is the
occupancy that is not screened by additional opposing vehicles.
To determine this relevant occupancy, OCCr, multiply
the total occupancy after the queue clears, OCCpedu,
by the probability that opposing vehicles do not screen the conflict
zone. Use Table 7 or:
OCCr = OCCpedu * e-(5/3600)Vo
3) Calculate the permitted phase
pedestrian-bicycle adjustment for turning vehicles, ApbT.
- If the number of receiving
lanes equals the number of turning lanes (i.e., Nrec< = Nturn):
- Vehicles cannot maneuver
around pedestrians or bicycles, and the adjustment is logically
the proportion of time the conflict zone is unoccupied from the
turning driver’s perspective. Use Table 8, or:
ApbT = 1 - OCCr
- If the number of receiving
lanes exceeds the number of turning lanes (i.e., Nrec > Nturn):
- Vehicles may have opportunities
to maneuver around pedestrians or bicycles, and the effect of pdesestrians
and bicycles on turning traffic is reduced. Use Table 8, or:
ApbT = 1 – 0.6 * OCCr
4) Compute the pedestrian-bicycle
adjustment factor for right turns, fRpb, or left turns,
fLpb.
- For right turns, the pedestrian-bicycle
adjustment factor, fRpb, is:
- fRpb
= 1.0 – PRT ( 1 – ApbT)(1- PRTA)
See Table 9 for simplified equations for each of six cases for fRpb.
- For left turns, the pedestrian
adjustment factor, fLpb, is:
- fLpb
= 1.0 - PLT(1 - ApbT) (1 - PLTA)
See Table 10 for simplified equations for each of six cases for
fLpb.
Figure
9
Supplemental
worksheet for pedestrian-bicycle effects on permissive right turns |
Figure
10
Supplemental
worksheet for pedestrian effects on permissive left turns |
TABLE 4
Intermediate Pedestrian-Bicycle Parameters:
Pedestrian Conflict Zone Occupancy (OCCpedg)
Vpedga |
OCCpedgb |
Vpedg |
OCCpedg |
Vpedg |
OCCpedg |
Vpedg |
OCCpedg |
0 |
0.00 |
500 |
0.25 |
1000 |
0.50 |
3500 |
0.75 |
100 |
0.05 |
600 |
0.30 |
1500 |
0.55 |
4000 |
0.80 |
200 |
0.10 |
700 |
0.35 |
2000 |
0.60 |
4500 |
0.85 |
300 |
0.15 |
800 |
0.40 |
2500 |
0.65 |
> 5000 |
0.90 |
400 |
0.20 |
900 |
0.45 |
3000 |
0.70 |
|
|
apedestrian
volume/h of pedestrian green time
baverage
conflict zone occupancy by pedestrians during pedestrian effective
green time |
TABLE 5
Intermediate Pedestrian-Bicycle Parameters:
Relevant Conflict Zone Occupancy (OCCr)
For Right Turns or Unopposed
Left Turns
Bicycle
Volume/h of green, Vbikeg
OCCpedg
a |
0 |
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
750 |
1000 |
1250 |
1500 |
1750 |
>1900 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.21 |
0.30 |
0.39 |
0.48 |
0.58 |
0.67 |
0.72 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
0.14 |
0.17 |
0.21 |
0.24 |
0.33 |
0.42 |
0.51 |
0.60 |
0.68 |
0.74 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
0.18 |
0.22 |
0.25 |
0.28 |
0.37 |
0.45 |
0.53 |
0.51 |
0.70 |
0.75 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
0.29 |
0.32 |
0.40 |
0.48 |
0.56 |
0.64 |
0.72 |
0.77 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.25 |
0.28 |
0.30 |
0.33 |
0.36 |
0.44 |
0.51 |
0.59 |
0.66 |
0.73 |
0.78 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.29 |
0.32 |
0.35 |
0.38 |
0.40 |
0.47 |
0.54 |
0.61 |
0.68 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.34 |
0.37 |
0.39 |
0.42 |
0.44 |
0.51 |
0.57 |
0.64 |
0.70 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.39 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.46 |
0.48 |
0.54 |
0.60 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
0.78 |
0.82 |
0.40 |
0.40 |
0.43 |
0.46 |
0.48 |
0.50 |
0.52 |
0.58 |
0.63 |
0.69 |
0.75 |
0.80 |
0.83 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.48 |
0.50 |
0.52 |
0.54 |
0.56 |
0.61 |
0.66 |
0.72 |
0.77 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.53 |
0.55 |
0.57 |
0.58 |
0.60 |
0.65 |
0.70 |
0.74 |
0.79 |
0.83 |
0.86 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.58 |
0.59 |
0.61 |
0.63 |
0.64 |
0.68 |
0.73 |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.62 |
0.64 |
0.65 |
0.67 |
0.68 |
0.72 |
0.76 |
0.79 |
0.83 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.67 |
0.68 |
0.70 |
0.71 |
0.72 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.88 |
0.90 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.72 |
0.73 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
0.76 |
0.79 |
0.82 |
0.84 |
0.87 |
0.90 |
0.92 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.76 |
0.77 |
0.78 |
0.79 |
0.80 |
0.82 |
0.85 |
0.87 |
0.89 |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.81 |
0.82 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
0.84 |
0.86 |
0.88 |
0.90 |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.94 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.86 |
0.86 |
0.87 |
0.88 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.92 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
0.96 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
0.91 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
0.93 |
0.94 |
0.95 |
0.96 |
0.97 |
0.97 |
|
aaverge conflict zone occupancy by pedestrians during
pedestrian effective green time
TABLE 6
Intermediate Pedestrian-Bicycle Parameters:
Conflict Zone Occupancy After Opposing
Queue Clears (OCCpedu
) for
Opposed Left Turns
Ratio of Opposing Queue Time to Effect.
Ped. Green, gq
/gp
Ratio
of Opposing Queue Time to Effect. Ped. Green, gq
/gp |
OCCpedg
a |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
<1.0b |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.09 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.20 |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.16 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.10 |
0.25 |
0.25 |
0.24 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.16 |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.26 |
0.24 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
0.20 |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.15 |
0.35 |
0.35 |
0.33 |
0.32 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
0.26 |
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.21 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
0.40 |
0.40 |
0.38 |
0.36 |
0.34 |
0.32 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
0.26 |
0.24 |
0.22 |
0.20 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.43 |
0.41 |
0.38 |
0.36 |
0.34 |
0.32 |
0.29 |
0.27 |
0.25 |
0.23 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.48 |
0.45 |
0.43 |
0.40 |
0.38 |
0.35 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
0.25 |
0.55 |
0.55 |
0.52 |
0.50 |
0.47 |
0.44 |
0.41 |
0.39 |
0.36 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
0.28 |
0.60 |
0.60 |
0.57 |
0.54 |
0.51 |
0.48 |
0.45 |
0.42 |
0.39 |
0.36 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
0.65 |
0.65 |
0.62 |
0.59 |
0.55 |
0.52 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.42 |
0.39 |
0.36 |
0.33 |
0.70 |
0.70 |
0.67 |
0.63 |
0.60 |
0.56 |
0.53 |
0.49 |
0.46 |
0.42 |
0.39 |
0.35 |
0.75 |
0.75 |
0.71 |
0.68 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.56 |
0.53 |
0.49 |
0.45 |
0.41 |
0.38 |
0.80 |
0.80 |
0.76 |
0.72 |
0.68 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.56 |
0.52 |
0.48 |
0.44 |
0.40 |
0.85 |
0.85 |
0.81 |
0.77 |
0.72 |
0.68 |
0.64 |
0.60 |
0.55 |
0.51 |
0.47 |
0.43 |
0.90 |
0.90 |
0.86 |
0.81 |
0.77 |
0.72 |
0.68 |
0.63 |
0.59 |
0.54 |
0.50 |
0.45 |
aaverage
conflict zone occupancy by pedestrians during effective ped. green
bif
gq /gp
> 1.0 then OCCpedu
= 0.00 and fLpb
= 1.0 |
TABLE
7
Intermediate Pedestrian-Bicycle Parameters:
Relevant Conflict Zone Occupancy (OCCr)
After Opposing Queue Clears For
Opposed Left Turns
Conflict Zone Occupancy After Queue,
OCCpedu
voa |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
0.30 |
0.40 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.70 |
0.80 |
0.90 |
0 |
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
0.30 |
0.40 |
0.50 |
0.60 |
0.70 |
0.80 |
0.90 |
100 |
0.00 |
0.09 |
0.17 |
0.26 |
0.35 |
0.44 |
0.52 |
0.61 |
0.70 |
0.78 |
200 |
0.00 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
0.30 |
0.38 |
0.45 |
0.53 |
0.61 |
0.68 |
300 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.13 |
0.20 |
0.26 |
0.33 |
0.40 |
0.46 |
0.53 |
0.59 |
400 |
0.00 |
0.06 |
0.11 |
0.17 |
0.23 |
0.29 |
0.34 |
0.40 |
0.46 |
0.52 |
500 |
0.00 |
0.05 |
0.10 |
0.15 |
0.20 |
0.25 |
0.30 |
0.35 |
0.40 |
0.45 |
600 |
0.00 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.22 |
0.26 |
0.30 |
0.35 |
0.39 |
700 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.11 |
0.15 |
0.19 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
0.30 |
0.34 |
800 |
0.00 |
0.03 |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.13 |
0.16 |
0.20 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
0.30 |
900 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.06 |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.14 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
1000 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.10 |
0.12 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
0.22 |
1100 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.20 |
1200 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
1300 |
0.00 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.10 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
1400 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
0.13 |
1500 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
0.11 |
2000 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.05 |
0.06 |
3000 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
> 4000 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
aopposing
vehicle volume, vehicles/h |
TABLE 8
Intermediate Pedestrian-Bicycle
Parameters:
Permitted Phase Turning Adjustment (ApbT)
For Right And Left Turns
OCCr
a |
Nrec
b = Nturn
c |
Nrec
> Nturn |
OCCr |
Nrec
= Nturn |
Nrec
> Nturn |
0.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.70 |
0.05 |
0.95 |
0.97 |
0.55 |
0.45 |
0.67 |
0.10 |
0.90 |
0.94 |
0.60 |
0.40 |
0.64 |
0.15 |
0.85 |
0.91 |
0.65 |
0.35 |
0.61 |
0.20 |
0.80 |
0.88 |
0.70 |
0.30 |
0.58 |
0.25 |
0.75 |
0.85 |
0.75 |
0.25 |
0.55 |
0.30 |
0.70 |
0.82 |
0.80 |
0.20 |
0.52 |
0.35 |
0.65 |
0.79 |
0.85 |
0.15 |
0.49 |
0.40 |
0.60 |
0.76 |
0.90 |
0.10 |
0.46 |
0.45 |
0.55 |
0.73 |
0.95 |
0.05 |
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
0.03 |
0.42 |
arelevant
conflict zone occupancy from Table 5 or Table 7
bnumber
of receiving lanes
cnumber
of turning lanes
TABLE 9 Proposed Adjustment
Factor For Pedestrian-Bicycle Effects On Right Turns (fRpb)
Cases 1-6:
Exclusive/Shared Lanes and Protected/Permitted Phasing
-
fRpb
= 1.0 - PRT
( 1 - ApbT
) ( 1 - PRTA
)
- 0.00 < PRT
< 1.0 Proportion of RT in lane group = 1.00 for excl.
RT lane (Cases 1-3);
-
< 1.00 for
shared/single lane (Cases 4-6).
- 0.03 < ApbT
< 1.0 Permitted Phase Turning Adjustment
- 0.00 < PRTA
< 1.0 Proportion of RT using protected phase:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- = 1.00 for protected
phase (no peds);
< 1.00 for permitted
phase (ped conflicts).
- fRpb
= 1.0 if PRT
= 0.0
- fRpb
> 0.03
Range of Variable Values
Case |
RT Lane |
RT Phase |
PRT
a |
PRTA
b |
SIMPLIFIED FORMULA |
1 |
Exclusive |
Protected |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2 |
Exclusive |
Permitted |
1.0 |
0.0 |
ApbT
c |
3 |
Exclusive |
Prot./Perm. |
1.0 |
0.0 - 1.0 |
1.0 - (1 - ApbT)(1
- PRTA) |
4 |
Shared |
Protected |
0 - 1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
5 |
Shared |
Permitted |
0 - 1.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 - PRT
(1 - ApbT) |
6 |
Shared |
Prot./Perm. |
0 - 1.0 |
0.0
- 1.0 |
1.0
- PRT
(1 - ApbT)(1
- PRTA) |
aproportion
of right turns in lane group
bproportion
of right turns using protected phase
cpermitted
phase turning vehicle adjustment from phase 3 discussion |
TABLE 10
Proposed Adjustment Factor For Pedestrian
Effects On Left Turns (fLpb)
Cases 1-6 : Exclusive/Shared Lanes and Protected/Permitted
Phasing
fLpb
= 1.0 - PLT
( 1 - ApbT
) ( 1 - PLTA
)
-
- 0.0 < PLT
< 1.0 Proportion of LT in lane group = 1.00 for excl.
LT lane (Cases 1-3);
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- < 1.00
for shared lane (Cases 4-6).
- 0.1 < ApbT
< 1.0 Permitted Phase Turning Adjustment
- 0.0 < PLTA
< 1.0 Proportion of LT using protected phase:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- = 1.00 for protected
phase (no peds);
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- < 1.00
for permitted phase (ped conflicts).
fLpb
= 1.00 if PLT
= 0.0
fLpb
> 0.10
Range
of Variable Values
Case |
LT Lane |
LT Phase |
PLT
a |
PLTA
b |
SIMPLIFIED FORMULA |
1 |
Exclusive |
Protected |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
2 |
Exclusive |
Permitted |
1.0 |
0.0 |
ApbT
c |
3 |
Exclusive |
Prot./Perm. |
1.0 |
0.0 - 1.0 |
1.0 - (1 - ApbT)(1
- PLTA) |
4 |
Shared |
Protected |
0 - 1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
5 |
Shared |
Permitted |
0 - 1.0 |
0.0 |
1.0 - PLT
(1 - ApbT) |
6 |
Shared |
Prot./Perm. |
0 - 1.0 |
0.0
- 1.0 |
1.0
- PLT
(1 - ApbT)(1
- PLTA) |
aproportion
of left turns in lane group
bproportion
of left turns using protected phase
cpermitted
phase turning vehicle adjustment from phase 3 discussion |
Figure
11 compares the saturation flow adjustment for turning vehicles from this
procedure with those discussed in the background section, using a green
time of 30 s and a cycle length of 60 s. As the figure shows, the two proposed
models lie near the middle of the other models. They generally follow the
Polish method (for C=90 and g=30), although they predict less effect of
pedestrians on saturation flow than the Polish method for high pedestrian
volumes. The graph for one net lane predicts more severe reductions in saturation
flow than all except the Canadian methods until roughly 900 pedestrians/h
(1800 per hour green at the assumed signal timing). The graph for more than
one net lane predicts virtually the same effect as the HCM up to
about 500 pedestrians/h (1000 per hour green). Beyond this level, it predicts
substantially less effect than the HCM, and somewhat less effect
than all methods except Zegeer above 800 pedestrians/h (1600 per hour green).
In the existing HCM,
one adjusts right turns for both radius and pedestrians
with f RT. Under the proposed method of separating the
effect of radius from pedestrians and bicycles, f RT
would only reflect the effect of radius on right turns (Table 11). Table
12 summarizes both the existing and proposed adjustment factors for lane
groups containing turning vehicles.
Figure
11
Comparison
of ApbT with other adjustment factors for pedestrians
|
TABLE 11
Proposed Adjustment Factor for Radius
Effects on Right Turns ( fRT
)
PRTa |
fRT |
PRT |
fRT |
PRT |
fRT |
0.00b |
1.000 |
0.35 |
0.948 |
0.70 |
0.895 |
0.05 |
0.992 |
0.40 |
0.940 |
0.75 |
0.888 |
0.10 |
0.985 |
0.45 |
0.932 |
0.80 |
0.880 |
0.15 |
0.978 |
0.50 |
0.925 |
0.85 |
0.872 |
0.20 |
0.970 |
0.55 |
0.918 |
0.90 |
0.865 |
0.25 |
0.962 |
0.60 |
0.910 |
0.95 |
0.858 |
0.30 |
0.955 |
0.65 |
0.902 |
1.00 |
0.850 |
NOTE: fRT
= 1.0 - PRT
(0.15) 0.0 <
PRT
< 1.0
aproportion
of right turns in lane group
bno
right turns from the lane group |
TABLE 12 Existing and
proposed saturation flow adjustment factors for lane groups containing
turning vehicles
Source of Impedance to Turning Vehicles
Procedure |
Movement |
Radius |
Opposing Vehicles |
Pedestrians |
Bicycles |
Existing |
Left-Turn |
fLT |
fLT |
ignored |
ignored |
Right-Turn |
fRT |
N/A |
fRT |
1
bike = 1 ped |
Proposed |
Left-Turn |
fLT |
fLT |
fLpb
a |
ignored |
Right-Turn |
fRT
a |
N/A |
fRpb
a |
fRpb
a |
|