![]() |
:: |
![]() No crosswalks or other ways to cross the street exist Request a marked crosswalk Can a traffic signal be helpful? Other ways to cross the street considerations for over- and underpasses Drivers do not yield to pedestrians using crosswalks Insist that the police enforce the pedestrian right-of-way law Make pedestrian crosswalks safer When trying to cross the street, the view of traffic is blocked by parked cars, bushes, trees or other obstacles Sources - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ![]() You may think that no crosswalks exist in your neighborhood, but crosswalks can either be marked or unmarked, and crosswalks exist at all public street intersections where the sidewalk crosses the street. For a crosswalk to exist at a midblock location, it must be marked. Pedestrians have the legal right to cross in marked or unmarked crosswalks. Marked crosswalks are used as a guide to tell pedestrians the best place to cross, to serve as a warning to motorists of pedestrian crossing activity, and to remind motorists to yield to pedestrians. They are also helpful at complex intersections to show exactly where to cross the street. Marked crosswalks are not as commonly used on local streets inside neighborhoods except when installed as part of a "Safe Route to School Plan" for children although some cities regularly mark crosswalks at most locations. Crosswalks are often marked at busy intersections, near schools or universities, at transit stops, and commercial or retail establishments.
While marked crosswalks have been shown to be successful in encouraging pedestrians to cross at a specific location, the results are mixed with respect to getting drivers to drive slower or safer, or to be more courteous to a pedestrian. On higher speed and busy, multi-lane streets, more substantial facilities are usually needed to provide safer crossings for pedestrians. These measures can include a raised median (pedestrian refuge) island, parking restrictions, advanced warning signs or pavement markings, brighter nighttime lighting, or other devices that can slow traffic down at the crossing or improve driver expectancy of the crossing. A zebra, ladder, or continental crosswalk marking pattern makes crosswalks more visible to motorists. To request a marked crosswalk at a crossing, you need to contact your city or town officials, most likely your city or town traffic engineer, or your city or town council. Before approaching your city or town officials, it's a good idea to acquaint yourself with the literature on crosswalks, links for which are available below. Factors that go in to the decision as to whether or not to mark a crosswalk usually include the roadway and traffic conditions as well as the number of pedestrians who cross the street. Some of these factors are outlined below:
Marked crosswalks should normally be installed at traffic signals where pedestrians are expected to cross. Pedestrians should be expected to cross from every corner of an intersection unless there are extraordinary and extenuating circumstances that make a part of the intersection unsafe. Marked crosswalks will encourage pedestrians to cross at the traffic signal and discourage motorists from blocking the walking path for pedestrians in the crosswalk. The city may have to install pedestrian crossing signals (if they do not currently exist) and should use highly reflective material for the crosswalk lines. In some cases pedestrian push buttons may also be needed. Crosswalk lines should be maintained in good condition. Report any instances where crosswalk lines are worn, faded, or have not been replaced after street resurfacing. Intersections with existing STOP signs It is helpful to install a marked crosswalk at a crossing controlled by a stop sign, especially when there is a moderate to high number of pedestrians that use the crossing or if the crossing is near a school or in a business district. Crosswalk markings help discourage stopping vehicles from blocking the walking path across the intersection and they help remind motorists of the presence of pedestrians. Highly reflective material should always be used for the crosswalk lines. Crosswalk lines should be maintained in good condition. Report any instances where crosswalk lines are worn, faded, or have not been replaced after street resurfacing. Locations without traffic signals or STOP signs Installing crosswalks lines alone may not be enough to improve pedestrian safety at mid-block areas and intersections without a stoplight or STOP sign (also known as an "uncontrolled crossing"), especially at wide, high speed streets. A national study on whether it is safer to have a marked or unmarked crosswalk at a crossing where no traffic signal or stop sign is present was recently conducted for the Federal Highway Administration. This study involved analysis of 5 years of pedestrian crashes at 1,000 marked crosswalks and 1,000 matched unmarked comparison sites. The study results revealed that on two-lane roads, the presence of a marked crosswalk alone at an uncontrolled location was associated with no difference in pedestrian crash rate, compared to an unmarked crosswalk. Furthermore, on multi-lane roads with traffic volumes above about 12,000 vehicles per day, having a marked crosswalk alone (without other substantial improvements) was associated with a higher pedestrian crash rate (after controlling for other site factors) compared to an unmarked crosswalk. Recommendations and guidelines are provided in the report on the placement of marked crosswalks and other crossing measures. The full study can be found here (http://www.walkinginfo.org/rd/devices.htm#cros1), on walkinginfo.org. However, when combined with other pedestrian improvements, properly designed crosswalks at uncontrolled crossings may increase pedestrian safety. For instance, the same study mentioned above found that raised medians provided significantly lower pedestrian crash rates on multi-lane roads, compared to roads with no raised median. Accordingly, properly designed crosswalks should employ a combination of the following design features to maximize pedestrian safety: A raised mid-block median or crossing island (also known as a refuge island);By being aware of these measures and suggesting them, you can help your city or town officials consider other measures to aid pedestrian travel. When used, crosswalk lines should be maintained in good condition. Report any instances where crosswalk lines are worn, faded, or have not been replaced after street resurfacing. Can a traffic signal be helpful? Traffic signals are an important means of traffic control. When used properly (and where warranted) they can help improve safety, manage traffic effectively, and make it easier to cross the street. However, a number of factors need to be considered before a traffic signal is installed. If the street is relatively narrow and motor vehicle traffic on the cross-street is moderate to low, the signal can result in more pedestrian delay while waiting for the WALK signal.Despite these concerns and considerations, where warranted, traffic signals (with pedestrian signals) can benefit pedestrians in certain situations. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), published by the Federal Highway Administration, provides conditions when the advantages of a traffic signal may outweigh the disadvantages of a signal. There are two warrants, or reasons, that specifically or partially apply to pedestrians: the Pedestrian Volume Warrant, meaning there is a large number of pedestrians that would benefit from the installation of a traffic signal, and the School Crossing Warrant, meaning there is a good opportunity to improve a crossing for children near a school. Even if these conditions apply, an important additional consideration is traffic signal spacing. When signalized locations are too close together, they could create more congestion, and may create gridlock conditions. In the core of a downtown area, it may be common to have traffic signals spaced one block apart, and traffic progression may be maintained by having one-way streets. In outlying areas, traffic signals should generally be spaced further apart. Because of the high cost of traffic signals and possible negative safety implications, it may be best to evaluate other measures in lieu of a signal, including raised median islands, reducing the number of lanes, improved lighting, improved warning signs or pavement markings. ![]() Pedestrian over- or underpasses (tunnels or bridges) are only helpful for busy pedestrian crossings across wide, high speed, or extremely high volume streets where there is no other safe way to get pedestrians across the street. While over- and underpasses can work well to keep pedestrians safe from vehicle traffic since they essentially take the pedestrian out of harms way, they are also very expensive and obtrusive. Additionally, underpasses may involve significant crime, drainage, and maintenance concerns. Overpasses will result in better security, but will result in complaints from nearby homeowners about the loss of privacy and aesthetics. Also, in some locations, pedestrians will not use the over- or underpass if they believe they can save time by dashing across the street. This puts them in greater jeopardy. Over- and underpasses also contribute to the sense that the road is a highway only for cars and that people do not belong. Communities should think carefully about the overall sense of place they want to convey when considering constructing an over- or underpass. Since ramps for overpasses (and underpasses) must be gradual enough to accommodate wheelchair users (with a maximum slope of 8.33%), they can be very lengthy and can greatly increase the distance traveled to cross the street. These ramps require a considerable amount of space on both sides of the bridge, which adds to the cost. The construction of underpasses can be very disruptive to traffic for a significant amount of time. Pedestrian underpasses or bridges can cost anywhere from $500,000 to $1.5 million or more. Accordingly, over- or underpasses should only be constructed as a last resort. It may be more appropriate to use traffic-calming measures, pedestrian crossing islands, or to install a pedestrian-activated traffic signal. Nevertheless, places that may necessitate an over- or underpass may include busy intersections (where a traffic signal cannot be used) or busy midblock crossings, school or university crossings, busy bike path crossings, or crossings of fast moving traffic such as interstates or state highways. To get your city to support the construction of an over- or underpass, read more about the following suggestions:
To get your city to consider constructing an over- or underpass, you need to make a strong argument that a large number of pedestrians will benefit, and that no other alternatives exist. To build your case, consider the following courses of action: Conduct simple and quick surveys of people at the crossing. You and some friends could ask passer-bys how often they would use the over- or underpass if it existed. Getting potential users and nearby business owners and residents to sign a petition would further your cause.These surveys, counts, and petitions would help provide City support and justification for funding for an under- or overpass project. ![]() Perhaps the best way to get an over- or underpass constructed in your area is to coordinate the timing of your request with proposed roadway construction, new development, or redevelopment projects. For example, if your community is planning to tear up the road to lay new utility lines or to repave the street, contact your city officials and suggest they consider installing a simple underpass at the same time. Better yet, if a canal or stream passes underneath the roadway at a given point and the city is planning to work on the channel, it is an ideal time to consider building a concrete path adjacent to the canal or stream. Major developers may also be a source of funding for a new over- or underpass if it can be shown that their development will create a substantial crossing problem or will greatly benefit from the crossing. These development or redevelopment projects may include university or hospital campuses. Consider the scale and setting of the project A low cost underpass may be nothing more than a tunnel composed of large concrete or corrugated metal pipes to create a simple walkway. More complicated underpasses involve more sophisticated designs that may include lighting, drainage facilities, ramps, and handrails to allow a large number of pedestrians and bicyclists through at the same time. Overpasses work best when the topography allows for a structure without ramps (e.g., overpass over a sunken freeway). Underpasses work best when designed to feel open and accessible. Ramps are required to make the underpass or overpass useable to people in wheelchairs. The ramps can be quite extensive and require a sizable area of land on each side of the bridge. This can also be quite expensive. Lighting, drainage, graffiti removal, drainage, and security are major concerns with underpasses. ![]() Drivers do not yield to pedestrians using crosswalks In most states, drivers are supposed to yield to or stop for pedestrians crossing the street in a crosswalk, even if the pedestrian is in an unmarked crosswalk. However, this point is not emphasized enough in driver education in the United States and police may not enforce these laws. This problem is more pronounced on higher speed streets where it is more difficult to get drivers to slow or yield to pedestrians. Pedestrians may become afraid to cross the street when motorists won't stop for them when they are crossing. These people may walk less. Fortunately, a number of steps can be taken to make pedestrian crossings safer that involve police enforcement and physical improvements.
Police enforcement is useful in educating motorists of the requirement to stop for pedestrians in a crosswalk. Police enforcement is most effective when it is part of a public safety information campaign. Enforcement campaigns designed to increase yielding behavior can produce a marked and sustained increase in the percentage of motorists yielding to pedestrians depending on how long the campaign lasts (i.e., longer campaigns equate to more sustained success). While enforcement projects are helpful, more long-term, on-going police enforcement measures should also be undertaken. City officials are essential in making pedestrian safety a priority to the police. Citizens and neighborhood advocates must inform their public officials of this need. Make pedestrian crosswalks safer Cities should improve pedestrian crosswalks when they are not working effectively. Treatments used to make streets easier to cross and crosswalks more visible to motorists include those treatments listed below. Though the following treatments do not work everywhere and should not be viewed as cure-alls due to some cautions (described below) and cost restraints, cities should consider these practices if they have an unsafe crossing on their hands.
According to the Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide, marked crosswalks indicate the best locations for pedestrians to cross the street and they help remind motorists that they are required to yield to pedestrians. Marked crosswalks are useful at some high pedestrian locations along with other measures to guide pedestrians along a preferred walking path. However, depending on their location and design, marked crosswalks are often not successful in getting drivers to drive slower or safer, or to be more courteous to a pedestrian, especially on higher speed and busy, multi-lane streets. For these kinds of streets, more substantial facilities, such as those bulleted above, may be needed to provide for safer crossings for pedestrians. If it is determined that a crosswalk should be marked, then to be visible to motorists, particularly at night, they must be marked with a bright retro-reflective material. Even though granite or cobblestones are aesthetically appealing materials, they are not appropriate as a walking surface or for marking the crosswalk lines. One of the best materials for marking crosswalks is inlay tape, which is ideal for use on new or repaved streets. It is highly reflective, long-lasting, and slip-resistant, and does not require a high level of maintenance. Although initially more costly than paint, both inlay tape and thermoplastic are more cost-effective in the long run. Raise the crossing above street level The Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide states that raised crosswalks (three to four inches high) encourage motorists to drive slower at the crossing, which will make them more likely to yield to crossing pedestrians. On one street in Cambridge, MA, the number of motorists who yielded to pedestrians crossing at crosswalks went from approximately 10 percent before installation of the raised crosswalks to 55 percent after the installations. Additionally, according to a study by the Federal Highway Administration, raised crosswalks increase pedestrian visibility and the likelihood that the driver yields to pedestrians especially when combined with an overhead flashing light. Raised crosswalks should not be used on emergency routes, bus routes, or high speed streets. Drainage of storm water runoff and snow plowing considerations may also be a concern with raised crosswalks. They are most appropriate on low speed local or neighborhood streets. Narrow the roadway Studies have found that roadway narrowing treatments (such as raised medians, curb extensions, etc.) can increase pedestrian safety. These treatments reduce the distance pedestrians have to cross the street, thereby decreasing their exposure to moving motor vehicles. A study for the Federal Highway Administration found that the presence of a raised median or crossing island can significantly reduce the likelihood of pedestrian crashes since the median can serve as a refuge for crossing pedestrians and may cause motorists to drive slower since the roadway appears less wide open. Curb extensions provide pedestrians a safe place to stand a view oncoming traffic before crossing. Place warning signs and/or lights or signals in advance, or above the crosswalk Warning signs and lights can help alert unfamiliar motorists to the presence of pedestrians who may be crossing the street. Warning signs should be used at locations where drivers may not typically expect pedestrians to cross, and at locations where school children frequently cross. Signs that integrate LED lights, such as the one pictured to the right, and/or other types of lighting such as flashers can also increase the awareness of drivers to the presence of pedestrians and, used in combination with other crosswalk treatments, can increase pedestrian safety. Warning signs can provide important information to improve road safety if used properly, consistently, and if they are not over-used. If motorists know what to expect, there is a greater chance that they will behave properly. Signs should be used judiciously, as overuse breeds noncompliance and disrespect. Too many signs may also create visual clutter and important signs can get lost. To request a sign for a crossing in your neighborhood, you should contact your city officials. Read below to find out what types of signs or lights could be useful for a difficult crossing in your neighborhood. Sign basics ![]() All traffic signals should have pedestrian crossing signals. However, some intersections may not, perhaps because little attention may have been paid to pedestrian activity at the time the traffic signal was installed, or it was not the practice of your community to install pedestrian signals during the period of time when the traffic signal was installed. Pedestrian signals are essential at complex intersections or when left-turn arrows exist. They should also be used a school crossings and for wide streets when pedestrians need to know if they will have enough time to complete their crossing. If you think that a pedestrian crossing signal would make it easier for pedestrians to cross a street in your neighborhood, then read below to find out how to pursue this end. Location ![]() ![]() If it is difficult for pedestrians to see traffic approaching their crosswalk, then it is dangerous for a person to try to cross the street. Crossings should be clear of obstacles to maximize the pedestrian's ability to see approaching vehicles and for approaching vehicles to see pedestrians. Additionally, changes to the street, such as curb extensions, can help improve the sight lines for pedestrians and motorists.
Keep bushes and trees in medians or at the sides of street crossings that may obstruct the view for a pedestrian properly pruned. You can help by reporting visibility problems at street crossings to your town, city, or homeowners association. Before entering the street, stop at the edge of the curb and look left and right. If you can see clearly and no branches or other obstacles obstruct your view, you've done a good job making the crosswalk a safer place for fellow pedestrians. If a neighbor needs to prune their vegetation, contact your city or homeowner's association. Request changes to the street If parked cars obstruct your view when you try to look for on-coming traffic before crossing the street, call your city to report the problem. One of the easiest solutions is to prohibit parking, or to enforce the existing parking restrictions. Bus stops should typically be located downstream from a crosswalk to improve conditions for pedestrians. You can suggest the city consider installing curb extensions or build parking bays so that pedestrians can see around the parked cars. Another solution may be to construct a raised crosswalk or provide additional warning signs, signals, or pavement markings to better alert motorists of the crossing. ![]() Sources Federal Highway Administration, 2001, "Safety Effects of Marked vs. Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations." http://www.walkinginfo.org/rd/devices.htm#cros1 Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, 2004, Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System. http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe Federal Highway Administration, 2000, "The Effects of Innovative Pedestrian Signs at Unsignalized Locations: A Tale of Three Treatments," http://www.walkinginfo.org/rd/devices.htm#3cities Federal Highway Administration, 2001, "The Effects of Traffic Calming Measures on Pedestrian and Motorist Behavior." http://www.walkinginfo.org/rd/for_ped.htm#calm Federal Highway Administration, 2001, "An Evaluation of High-Visibility Crosswalk Treatment - Clearwater, Florida." http://www.walkinginfo.org/rd/devices.htm#clear City of Madison, 1999, "Field Evaluation of Experimental 'In-Street' Yield to Pedestrian Signs," http://www.ci.madison.wi.us/transp/Bicycle/report98.pdf City of Kirkland, 1999, "Kirkland's Experience with In-Pavement Flashing Lights at Crosswalks," http://www.ci.kirkland.wa.us/depart/Public_Works/Transportation___Streets/Kirkland_s_Experience_with_In-pavement_Flashing_Crosswalks.htm Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, 2002, "FAQs: Crossing the Street." http://www.walkinginfo.org/insight/faqs/cross.htm ![]() |